<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blogging less can be effective too</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.designyourmarketing.co.uk/2009/07/blogging-less-can-be-effective-too/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.designyourmarketing.co.uk/2009/07/blogging-less-can-be-effective-too/</link>
	<description>Providing you with what I think you should know about blogging</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 03:24:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Abandoning your blog is a wasted opportunity &#171; Success Network Recipes</title>
		<link>http://www.designyourmarketing.co.uk/2009/07/blogging-less-can-be-effective-too/comment-page-1/#comment-672</link>
		<dc:creator>Abandoning your blog is a wasted opportunity &#171; Success Network Recipes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 08:34:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.designyourmarketing.co.uk/?p=215#comment-672</guid>
		<description>[...] How often? Regularity is better than frequency. Michael Martine of Remarkablogger stated in a recent post that he now blogs less than before, but his posts have a much higher value in their content so his SEO impact is higher, as well as the quality of comemnts. See what he says in one of my posts: http://www.designyourmarketing.co.uk/2009/07/blogging-less-can-be-effective-too/  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] How often? Regularity is better than frequency. Michael Martine of Remarkablogger stated in a recent post that he now blogs less than before, but his posts have a much higher value in their content so his SEO impact is higher, as well as the quality of comemnts. See what he says in one of my posts: <a href="http://www.designyourmarketing.co.uk/2009/07/blogging-less-can-be-effective-too/" rel="nofollow">http://www.designyourmarketing.co.uk/2009/07/blogging-less-can-be-effective-too/</a>  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: New blog content results in contented readers and busy spiders &#124; Design Your Marketing</title>
		<link>http://www.designyourmarketing.co.uk/2009/07/blogging-less-can-be-effective-too/comment-page-1/#comment-571</link>
		<dc:creator>New blog content results in contented readers and busy spiders &#124; Design Your Marketing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 09:45:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.designyourmarketing.co.uk/?p=215#comment-571</guid>
		<description>[...] How often? Regularity is better than frequency. Michael Martine of Remarkablogger stated in a recent post that he now blogs less than before, but his posts have a much higher value in their content so his SEO impact is higher, as well as the quality of comemnts. See what he says in one of my posts: http://www.designyourmarketing.co.uk/2009/07/blogging-less-can-be-effective-too/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] How often? Regularity is better than frequency. Michael Martine of Remarkablogger stated in a recent post that he now blogs less than before, but his posts have a much higher value in their content so his SEO impact is higher, as well as the quality of comemnts. See what he says in one of my posts: <a href="http://www.designyourmarketing.co.uk/2009/07/blogging-less-can-be-effective-too/" rel="nofollow">http://www.designyourmarketing.co.uk/2009/07/blogging-less-can-be-effective-too/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
